September 2, 2025
The Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea is famous for formulating paradoxes that challenge our intuition about motion and infinity. One famous thought experiment imagines Achilles chasing a turtle. Even though Achilles runs faster, Zeno argues he can never catch the turtle: by the time Achilles reaches where the turtle was, the turtle has moved a little further ahead, and so on, ad infinitum. Formally, we can write Achilles’ path as a geometric series.
Suppose Achilles runs ten times faster than the turtle, and the turtle has a head start of distance . The sequence of distances Achilles runs to reach the turtle’s successive positions is:
This is an infinite sum: At first glance, it seems Achilles must complete infinitely many tasks, therefore he will never reach the turtle. But the infinite series has a finite limit:
Achilles needs to run only a finite distance, slightly larger than , to overtake the turtle. This is intuitive: The larger the speed-ratio of the both, the smaller the distance. The paradox dissolves once we accept that an infinite process can converge to a finite outcome.